Rapor • Board Game Arena

Bütün Raporlar

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game Raporlar

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

notabug: Bu bir bug degil

Bu rapor neyle alakali?

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game #129404798

Ne oldu? Lütfen aşağıdan seçin

Kural: Oyunun bir kurali bu oyunda ihlal edildi

Ne oldu? Lütfen aşağıdan seçin

Kural: Oyunun bir kurali bu oyunda ihlal edildi

Lütfen aynı konuda bir rapor olup olmadığını kontrol edin

Eğer evet ise, lütfen bu rapor için oy verin. En çok oy alan raporlar ÖNCELİKLİ!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Detayli tanim

Rapor geçmişi

Dec 7 th 2020 04:01 • TheRandy • Hata olusumu yapimcilar tarafindan tekrarlanamadi. :

The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner.
We both had 4 districts.
We both controlled 1 swing county.
The game assigned the victory to the other payer:
(blue) Forevergm 4 (2)
(red) TheRandy 4 (1)

The output message was: "Number of swing counties won"-
there are only 2 swing counties in the game.

Looking at the rules: "On the rare occasion that there’s still a tie, go to the Supreme Court. Whichever tied player has the fewest total votes for their own party within their own districts wins." My count was: (it might be off a point of 2): 78 blue - 63 red.

Dec 7 th 2020 04:21 • gkz • Bu bir bug degil:

In an `n` player game, there should be `n + 1` swing counties: the `n` 1 tokens for each color and the neutral 0 token.

In this particular game, the blue player won the red 1 and the blue 1 (looks like the red 1 was underneath a meeple). The red player won the neutral 0. Thus the game counted the swing counties correctly.

---

Note that with 2 players, it should be impossible to go to the Supreme Court (since the tie break is majority of the 3 swing counties). With more players, it's possible to have a tie in swing counties. However, in such a case, the game won't actually fall back to this Supreme Court rule, since that was never implemented :). It'll just say that both players ended up winning. I'm also not sure if BGA's framework will allow for multiple tiebreak conditions (just based on the structure of the config), but I could look into it if it becomes a problem.

Dec 23 rd 2020 18:46 • Scott_wmu • Bu bir bug degil:

Per the notes above, it looked like the second tiebreaker was never coded (“Supreme Court”). We played a 4 player where is showed a shared victory even though Yellow was the victor per the rules (57 < 65 votes for own in own districts).

boardgamearena.com/table?table=132155273

Just pointing out an occurrence - not sure how often it happens.

Dec 23 rd 2020 19:35 • gkz • Bu bir bug degil:

Thanks for the note! Could you actually open a suggestion bug about implementing supreme court? I don't think it'll happen that often, but would be better to track separately from this.

Bu rapora ekleme yap

Lütfen bu hatanın hangi aşamaları izleyerek oluştuğuyla ilgili veya önerinizi anlamamız için buraya alakalı görünen her şeyi ekleyin.:

Başka bir masa ID / hareket ID
F5 sorunu çözdü mü?
Bu sorun cok mu oluyor ? Her zaman mi ? Tesadüfen mi ?
If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use a picture hosting service of your choice (snipboard.io for example) to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

İptal Raporu güncelle

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

Bu rapor neyle alakali?

Ne oldu? Lütfen aşağıdan seçin

Ne oldu? Lütfen aşağıdan seçin

Lütfen aynı konuda bir rapor olup olmadığını kontrol edin

Detayli tanim

Rapor geçmişi

Bu rapora ekleme yap

Rapor durumunu değiştir:

Yardım

Katkıda bulun

Gezin

Bizi Takip Edin